Ads

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Lower Enterprise Storage Costs: Open Source

Lower Enterprise Storage Costs: Open Source

Two data storage vendors have released new products that they claim can save users a bundle over more traditional storage systems.

Nexenta and ParaScale both use open source software and commodity hardware to lower storage costs for enterprises.

Nexenta uses Sun's (NASDAQ: JAVA) ZFS file system and x86 servers to create enterprise-class storage, while ParaScale uses Linux and commodity hardware to create a "private cloud" of tier 2 file storage.

Along with NexentaStor 2.2, the latest version of Nexenta's unified NAS and SAN solution based on ZFS, the company has also introduced a new software suite, Pomona, that automates provisioning and management of multiple NexentaStor and other storage systems.

NexentaStor 2.2 also includes additional support for both VMware (NYSE: VMW) and Citrix (NASDAQ: CTXS), and the solution supports CIFS, NFS, iSCSI and Fibre Channel protocols.

The latest version also includes stronger database integration with Oracle and MySQL. Data deduplication is also planned soon, thanks to Sun's addition of the data reduction technology to ZFS, and pNFS support is also in the works.

Nexenta claims it can save users 70 to 80 percent over proprietary solutions. The company boasts 13,000 free users and 727 paid users to date.

Enterprise Strategy Group analyst Terri McClure said in a statement that "Efforts like Nexenta's are propelling storage into the 21st century, much like Red Hat and Linux did for the server industry."

Nexenta CEO Evan Powell said the company was founded by the creators of the Open-iSCSI.org project, which is now part of the Linux kernel. They latched onto OpenSolaris as soon as it became available to start Nexenta.org, and from there they moved into selling their software and services to enterprises.

Powell said he isn't worried about the fate of ZFS if the Sun-Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) merger ever gets cleared by the European Union.

“Gigantic storage users are using ZFS. It's the best file system on the planet and it's open source. The code and the community will continue even if something happens counter to expectations.”

SAP Launches Sustainability Management App

SAP Launches Sustainability Management App

SAP on Thursday unveiled what it believes is the software industry's most comprehensive and useful green application to date with the launch of SAP BusinessObjects Sustainability Management.

The application, which was developed with the help of some of SAP's (NYSE: SAP) largest and most environmentally conscience customers including Lexmark and Nestle, will give enterprise customers the ability to cull through hundreds of business applications and extract the pertinent sustainability data and consolidate it in one dashboard to manage an organization's overall sustainability program.

Sustainability, which obviously includes environmental responsibility but also incorporates social and economic considerations, is not just something corporations do for good public relations these days -- it's a business imperative.

In October, Walmart (NYSE: WMT), which recorded more than $406 billion in sales last year, threw down the gauntlet to its 100,000-plus suppliers worldwide with the creation of the Walmart Sustainability Index.

The index is designed to provide Walmart and its customers with a single source of data for evaluating the sustainability of the products it sells and, not unintentionally, raises the bar for manufacturers looking to do business with the world's largest retailer.

Along those lines, more and more multinational corporations are voluntarily participating in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), a network-based organization that's established the framework for benchmarking organizational performance with respect to sustainable development and commerce.

To meet the demands of the Walmarts of the world -- to say nothing of current and future environmental legislation by local, national and international governments -- companies are faced with the daunting challenge of gathering all their data, like carbon emissions, water consumption, electricity used in the datacenter, and so on. And they have to make sense of it without spending millions in what's still somewhat of an altruistic endeavor.

SAP, which prides itself as the leader among software vendors on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for three years running, said its new sustainability management application will deliver that data quickly from all the disparate production, sales, manufacturing, HR and health and safety applications running in the enterprise.

"We are so proud of this product," Peter Graf, SAP's chief sustainability officer, said during a conference call Thursday. "It gives companies the ability to truly drive their sustainability and live up to the promises made to their customers, their employees and their management."

The software provides a holistic view of an organization's sustainability indicators and features an easy-to-use interface that streamlines internal and external reporting. SAP officials said it then helps turn data into actionable insight that can be cascaded and executed on throughout an organization, making it easier to track compliance with sustainability strategies across the business.

It includes a library of more than 100 key performance indicators that were jointly developed with Nestle and Lexmark to identify the most important environmental, social and business metrics required to deliver a comprehensive view of an organization's overall sustainability.

Using the business intelligence and analytics features developed by BusinessObjects, the application analyzes these KPIs and provides them in a single snapshot view, so C-level executives can quickly ascertain just how well or how poorly a particular region or business unit is doing in its sustainability efforts.

SAP officials said the application is designed to support SAP and non-SAP business applications and can be used to manually input some data in an organized and structured fashion that keeps all the data fresh and pooled in the appropriate data fields.

"In conversations with our customers, they've told us that [sustainability management] isn't really a voluntary activity," Graf said. "It's a mainstream task and managing it through phone calls and Excel spreadsheets is to expensive."

"The public and governments are putting pressure on them to be accountable," he added. "You have to make sure the information you have is easily retrievable and audited."

As the Walmart Sustainability Index was announced, the retailer made it clear that there was an undeniably competitive element to the program -- it was designed to "create a race to the top," according to a statement at the time from Matt Kistler, Walmart's senior vice president of sustainability.

Along with helping it facilitate the selection of "preferred products," Walmart said it also expects the index to help it track its enormous supply chain, drive product innovation and variety and hold its buyers and suppliers accountable for their impact on the environment and their local communities.

"Sustainability is increasingly mission-critical across the corporate world," said Stephen Stokes, AMR Research's vice president of sustainability and green technologies. "Managing and reporting an organization's sustainable performance via transparent and high quality data collation, analysis, optimization and modeling is a new basis for defining and communicating operational excellence."

Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains

Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains

Deltek Systems, Inc. (www.deltek.com ), the leading provider of enterprise software and solutions for project-based businesses and professional services firms, remains committed to a potentially unique, high level of investment in product development as compared to other software companies. According to Kenneth E. deLaski, Deltek President and CEO, the average public software company only invests approximately 14.5 percent of its revenue in product development and, at 24 percent, Deltek customers should take this as a strong sign that the vendor is deeply committed to continued investment and improvement of each of its product suites for project businesses and professional services firms. Deltek also announced that, once again, it achieved strong profitability and cash flow for fiscal 2002, which reportedly marked the 18th consecutive year of profitability for the company. In addition, the company added more than 300 new customers during the year in a variety of industries including aerospace, construction, engineering, IT services, consulting, architecture, and project-based manufacturing.
Within its marketing and proposal automation product, Deltek has an emerging CRM derivative known as client relationship management, which should help firms (such as accounting practices and law offices), other professional service companies; technical services; and, project-based organizations track client relationships in a more sophisticated manner than referrals or word-of-mouth, which were appropriate during the start-up phases of such companies. Subsequently accessing a client's record in Deltek Vision will also list the client's employees and former employers via hyperlink, enabling users to keep tabs on industry movement and turnover.

In a project-based business, there are no dedicated sales teams on the road chasing and securing new business since most senior partners and project managers bring in their own business and look after their own client portfolio. Consequently, traditional sales calls or consumer internet storefront ordering approaches become inappropriate in these situations. Therefore, the critical element of the client relationship process is to secure new business through proposal development. However, trying to recall the details of relevant past jobs and those who worked on them plus gathering the hard copies of such information from different people can be a nightmare. To that end, Deltek proposal management system allows a contractor to organize projects by various categories such as people, projects, designs, and expertise allowing appropriate information (e.g., resumes, document boilerplates, etc.) to become easily retrievable in the preparation of new proposals. Users can then track the progress of a proposal, share the information with other team members, review similar proposals, and analyze awarded jobs through a product that offers both government and customized commercial proposal generators.

SAS Enterprise Intelligence Platform

SAS Enterprise Intelligence Platform


These impressive analytics also include a diverse set of predictive, descriptive, and statistical analytics software to help decision makers anticipate how their actions will impact the future, and it turns almost every employee into a knowledge worker. SAS 9 also includes the SAS Enterprise Intelligence Platform as a foundation for future SAS horizontal and vertical BI solutions. Other main strands include a broad set of integrated software for data integration through the SAS Enterprise ETL Server; data warehousing through the SAS Intelligence Storage; and portal capabilities, and query, and reporting through the SAS Enterprise BI Server. These offer several UIs the opportunity to improve usability throughout all levels of the enterprise. SAS 9 data integration includes data quality and a common metadata repository for ensuring reliability of information across computing systems. SAS Enterprise ETL Server cleanses and integrates data into a common, usable data store that offers an available, consistent, and verifiable set of answers across the enterprise. In other words, the power behind the SAS 9 platform is tight integration, data quality, common metadata, and centralized management.

At the same time, SAS also announced plans to deliver seven software solutions that will take advantage of the SAS 9 Enterprise Intelligence Platform, to provide organizations with an integrated suite of solutions that addresses many key business challenges. Each of these solutions aims at helping user organizations go beyond BI as they know it, and ensure that more and more people within those companies—from the factory floor to the boardroom—can use the predictive analytics and data management capabilities of SAS. With SAS 9 and its new UIs and capabilities, SAS believes the group of potential users will expand so much that even more than 80 percent of the people in an organization will have access to BI solutions. The seven SAS solutions on the SAS 9 Enterprise Intelligence Platform are

* SAS Customer Intelligence address key areas such as marketing automation, marketing optimization, and customer retention. Designed to give organizations the insights they need to develop and implement smarter customer strategies and maximize customer profitability.

* SAS Risk Dimensions helps financial services firms and energy companies measure and analyze their risks, meet regulatory reporting requirements, and improve capital allocation. Risk Dimensions provide an open, flexible, and extensible environment for data management, risk analysis, and risk reporting. Additionally, SAS has aggressively pursued the opportunity to assist the banking and insurance industries in the pivotal area of risk management. In 2003, it acquired OpRisk Analytics, a provider of operational risk measurement and management solutions, to extend SAS' offerings for both corporate and consumer risk measurement and reporting. SAS also acquired RiskAdvisory, a provider of risk management and consulting software to energy companies. This acquisition has significantly enhanced SAS' ability to offer high-value energy risk management solutions to customers in industries such as oil, gas, and utilities. It also caters to financial services, as banks begin to sell energy into wholesale markets.

* SAS Strategic Performance Management translates company strategy into actions that can be measured and monitored throughout the entire organization. Results are then distributed via the Web to provide employees with the necessary information to analyze, collaborate, and implement strategy. SAS SPM helps executives improve performance while executing their strategic goals by focusing their entire organization on the initiatives and key performance indicators (KPI). KPIs are delivered via a Web browser and built-in filtering and alerts send out a call to action when performance is not meeting targets. Once notified, users can use SAS advanced analytics to discover why performance is not meeting targets, allowing users to take corrective action accordingly.

* SAS Supplier Relationship Management (SAS SRM) addresses procurement and purchasing as a vital link in the supply chain. Through data management and analytics, SAS SRM provides organizations with worldwide insight into suppliers, commodities, and procurement activities. With it, they can better understand their overall supplier landscape, minimize risks associated with suppliers, improve negotiation, and achieve substantial cost savings.

* SAS Activity-Based Management (ABM) integrates existing financial and operational systems to generate cost and profitability business models that support better overall decision-making. SAS ABM delivers advanced business modeling capabilities, a Web-enabled analysis and reporting interface, and data integration tools to retrieve and transform data from virtually any system. It enables strategic and operational decisions that maximize profit, reduce costs, and streamline processes by determining the cost of processes and the profitability of products, customers, and business segments. Built on a Web-based, multi-user, client-server architecture, the product goes beyond typical ABM tools by combining visual business modeling with advanced reporting and analysis, and data management, providing a more complete ABM solution.

* SAS IT Management Solutions helps companies better manage their IT organization and infrastructure and evaluate and control IT usage and costs. Combined with SAS' professional services organization and implementation partners network, these are the solutions that address the entire spectrum of IT services—systems, network, Web services, call centers and phone systems—from the data center to the desktop, across the enterprise and the Internet.

SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions

SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions


Being a technology leader today does not ensure longevity. Companies must continually reinvent themselves in a way that meets the needs of a rapidly changing market, yet reinvention must be balanced, incorporating the relevant aspects of a company that secured its top position in the first place. SAS Institute delivers business analytics solutions, but has been expanding its presence in certain verticals, and has been making a series of well-thought out acquisitions to sustain its technology leadership.

Part two of the SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership series.

Leveraging its early 2000's acquisitions like Intrinsic's campaign management and Verbind's interaction management solution, SAS has become a notable marketing automation (MA) player rather than a business intelligence (BI) platform provider per se—other BI pure competitors, except possibly for NCR's Teradata division, will have a time of repeating SAS' feat. SAS and Teradata are be prime examples of technology providers that have initially had a long focus on very scalable BI and datawarehousing (DW) deployments (see SAS Institute Shoots for the Two-Stop-Shop with new Release of Warehouse Administrator and SAS Puts the "E" in "Data"). They have been evolving into true business applications players for some time now by being able to combine their deep analytics and BI solution functionality with certain enterprise applications areas, as seen in the case of MA. This will remain a key feat for these BI vendors as they expand their scope into more action-oriented business processes instead of limiting them to conceptual BI roles. In particular, SAS became a marginal player in the CRM and MA market with its acquisition of Intrinsic in 2001, and the release of SAS Marketing Automation 4 in 2004 gave it some sales traction and market visibility in the space.

To brush up on our knowledge, marketing automation (MA) involves analyzing and automating the marketing process, which includes a proactive strategy for using information and IT in marketing. The ultimate goal is to properly allocating marketing resources to the activities, channels, and media with the best potential return and impact on profitable customer relationships. The new metrics of customer profitability, lifetime value, and wallet share are needed to supplement the traditional metrics of market share and penetration. Typical functional components of MA include customer data cleansing and analysis tools, and campaign management systems.

SAS has been able to tackle the market owing to its protracted expertise in predictive analytics, which includes all analytics, both tools and packaged applications, that are more complex in their mathematics than core analytics. Core analytics are those used to define or analyze a current or past state, consisting of both tools and packaged applications that compute frequencies, cross-tabs, query and reporting cubes. Predictive analytics are better capable of determining the probable future outcome of an event, among other uses. For example, one can benefit from the ability to execute marketing campaigns, but it is much more beneficial to be able to identify segments within a customer base where subscriptions will likely be cancelled and the customer possibly goes to the competitor. It is thus more effective to have that predictive capability, and then build a campaign to go after those potentially lost accounts.

APICS Dictionary defines customer relationship management (CRM) as a marketing philosophy based on putting the customer first. In contrast to enterprise resources planning (ERP) back-office information, CRM emphasizes the collection and analyses of information designed for sales and marketing decision support to understand and support existing and potential customer needs, including account management, catalog and order entry, payment processing, credits and adjustments, and other functions.

Leading analysts concur that CRM is a business strategy designed to optimize profitability, revenue and customer satisfaction by organizing the enterprise around customer segments, fostering customer-centric behavior and implementing customer-centric processes. But, the major commercial CRM software application areas include sales force automation (SFA), customer service and support (CSS), call centers, and marketing automation (MA). CRM entails all aspects of interaction a company has with its customer, whether it be sales, marketing or service related. Computerization has also changed the way companies are approaching t

Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions

Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions


Modern BI suites should be able to access and present key business measures for sales, customer service, the supply chain, financials, purchasing, inventory, and many other areas. It should then allow this information to be used as the basis for comparisons, calculations, ratios, and metrics. Users should be able to dynamically combine business measures to derive key performance indicators (KPI), such as product profitability, margin analysis, book-to-bill ratios, return on investment (ROI), and other vital metrics. Typical data that manufacturing enterprises should know about, on a daily basis, include inventory situation, rejected items, throughput, booked sales, order status, on-time shipments, warranty levels, etc. In each of these categories, users may want to get behind the numbers and the trends to discern the root causes or find out what items, regions, channel partners, or customers are involved.

Striving to meet this need, SAS has recently enhanced its demand management module , High Performance Forecasting. High Performance Forecasting is aimed at consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers, and allows users to crunch millions of predictions over hundreds of different stores, locations, or products in short timeframes. The tool is designed for companies with a large number of product stock-keeping units (SKU), which creates a vast number of potential combinations for a forecast. The tool not only looks at historical sales data, but it can also factor in seasonality, holidays, and promotions. The key difference between High-Performance Forecasting and traditional forecasting products is its ability to automate forecasts by embedding so-called "smart defaults" within the data in order to determine the best forecasting model and to pick different forecasts for different models. Up until now, a good forecasting required a savvy analyst to handcraft a forecast, but no human can possibly build a sound forecast for thousands of items.

So far, SAS has a notable track record with its customer profitability projects. Examples of such projects include Auna Group in Spain, Vodacom in South Africa, and One in Austria, whereas SAS Telecommunications Intelligence Solutions are used by many of the world's leading carriers to drive their broader BI efforts. Customers range from Hutchinson 3G in Austria to MTS in Russia and Omnitel in Lithuania. In addition to helping identify customer, product, channel, and tariff profitability, the enhanced SAS Telecommunications Intelligence Solution also includes the following capabilities:

* Customizable telecommunications-specific analytic and reporting components for customer retention, payment risk, cross-sell and up-sell analysis, customer behavior and segmentation to speed implementation and increase ROI.

* Flexible and scalable telecommunications-specific data architecture that supports modular and more rapid implementations for both mobile and fixed line systems.

* Enterprise wide business scorecard with telecommunications-specific KPI that enable a more strategic single view of the enterprise.

In addition to enhancements to products, SAS has also created a strategic alliance with Amdocs, partnered with Aprimo, and acquired Marketmax.

Strategic Alliance with Amdocs

Strategic Alliance with Amdocs


In mid-February SAS and Amdocs (NASDAQ: DOX) announced a strategic alliance that promises to deliver advanced marketing automation (MA) and decision-centric BI solutions to communications service providers (CSP). Amdocs, an Israeli-based, global provider of billing systems, customer care, and support for the communications industry, has revamped its marketing strategy aiming to become a customer relationship management solutions provider offering software and services that encompass the entire customer life cycle—from target, sell, deliver, bill, and support. In this new alliances the two companies seek to give CSPs a better means to track and analyze customer data, offering a solution that will present valuable information dynamically in the operational systems that span the customer life cycle. Ultimately, through this alliance, SAS and Amdocs promise to decrease their customers' total cost of ownership (TOC) while increasing their customers' ROI.

The first offering from SAS and Amdocs is the Customer Profitability and Segmentation solution. It offers augment the ability of CSPs to make and execute decisions by looking at customers' behavioral drivers thereby creating a personalized and differentiated customer experience. Other solutions, such as churn management predictive modeling are also forthcoming. In addition to joint products, SAS will also take over Amdocs' current marketing campaign management application.

Amdocs will encourage dozens of its campaign management clients to migrate to SAS Marketing Automation 4 offering. Customers will also be offered access to SAS Telecommunications Intelligence Solutions. This prepackaged solution has been available since mid-2004 and caters to the distinctive needs of carriers. Marketing Automation 4 incorporates SAS' proven activity-based management (ABM) and gives carriers the ability to identify customers, product, channel, and tariff profitability. Ultimately, this strategic partnership should give customers granular views of cost and profitability for more effective decision-making.

Partnership with Aprimo

Partnership with Aprimo


The most recent tool (and a buzzword) in the world of marketing automation is the emergence of the marketing resource management (MRM) pioneered by Aprimo (www.aprimo.com), an Indianapolis, Indian-based (US), privately-held vendor. Facing shrinking budgets, marketing departments are more accountable for the cost of their activities, and MRM applications are designed to improve the use of marketing resources. They should help marketing professionals to plan ahead for the factors like time for human resources, time for financial resources and responsibilities for different team members at different steps. The focus is on designing and creating a sound marketing strategy, determining the best allocation of marketing budgets, managing marketing skills, and more effectively tracking and supporting marketing processes, such as the marketing collateral creation. MRM combines workflow capabilities for assigning tasks and triggering alerts and knowledge management (KM) to comply with marketing best practices.

Tighter control over the projected budget, the planning, and the execution combined with a myriad of functions from campaign and lead management modules have pushed the limits of MA and that is the reason vendors such as Aprimo and Unica are now referring to their products as enterprise marketing management (EMM) solutions. To that end, Aprimo Marketing 6 is a suite of Web-based software products designed to enhance and work interfaced with existing ERP and CRM systems, as to enable marketing teams to achieve improved execution, gain managerial visibility across the global marketing organization and create more demand for products and services. Aprimo is delivering value to many industry-leading companies, including Bank of America, Alticor, Delta Faucet, Ernst & Young, Merrill Lynch and Pfizer. For more information on Aprimo and Unica, see Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? and Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players?.

As a result of the demand from their mutual customers, earlier in 2004, SAS and Aprimo announced a partnership to integrate the MRM products within the Aprimo Marketing suite into SAS Marketing Automation 4. The integrated solutions will be immediately available as a SAS offering through its global sales channels. The vendors cite that tightly linking the ability to execute and analyze with the ability to plan and manage should accelerate the marketing optimization cycle and decrease the disruptive time spent moving huge data loads between diverse environments.

The result was SAS' MA suite, comprised of proven customer data management, campaign management (an application used by marketers to design multi-channel marketing campaigns and track the effect of those campaigns, by customer segment, over time), predictive analytics, campaign, and optimization solutions. It also includes Aprimo's marketing planning and budgeting, production management, and marketing asset fulfillment and delivery management applications. The combined offering should give marketing departments an integrated environment to manage and coordinate pertinent marketing programs, activities and related resources.

Marketing Analysis

Marketing Analysis


Strategic moves by SAS Institute (see Part Two of this note) are a response to the requirement that modern business intelligence (BI) suites be able to access and present key business measures for sales, customer service, the supply chain, financials, purchasing, inventory, and many other areas. In addition to these functions, BI suites must also provide the ability to use information building blocks as the basis for comparisons, calculations, ratios, and metrics. Users should be able to dynamically combine business measures to derive key performance indicators (KPI), such as product profitability, margin analysis, book-to-bill ratios, return on investment (ROI), and other vital metrics. Typical data that manufacturing enterprises should know about, on a daily basis, include inventory situation, rejected items, throughput, booked sales, order status, on-time shipments, and warranty levels. In each of these categories, users may want to get behind the numbers and trends to discern the root causes or find out what items, regions, channel partners, or customers are involved.

Part Three of the SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership series.

For many reasons, SAS's alliance with Amdocs (NASDAQ: DOX) and partnership with Aprimo might be one of the few vendor partnerships where both customers and vendors benefit. By including customer, supplier, and information technology-related (IT) intelligence, SAS has a product functional scope that moves well beyond financial BI solutions to espouse a holistic corporate performance management (CPM) vision. However, the company will still face strong competition in many vertical markets from other leading BI vendors, such as Cognos and Business Objects. We believe SAS could further strengthen its position and enter more vertical markets by espousing a stronger original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or independent software vendor (ISV) partner strategy, which enables third parties to add their vertical, industry-specific experience, and accompanying front-ends and tools to SAS' analytical engine. The resulting packages could be resold into large and mid-market companies in those verticals.

In addition to the ongoing competition from a plethora of traditional BI players, or from statistical package market players, such as Insightful's S-Plus and SPSS, SAS is also facing a new nemesis in Siebel. Siebel designed Siebel Enterprise Analytics from the scratch and with data integration in mind. In two years, this product has grown from a few early adopters to become one of the vendor's fastest-growing, and possibly the largest product lines in 2004.

Needless to say, Siebel has long been a customer relationship management (CRM) archrival to Aprimo in the realm of enterprise marketing management (EMM), but it has also posed challenges to Amdocs in the call center and customer service space within the telecommunication sector. Both Siebel and Amdocs the largest two remaining pure-play CRM vendors and the competition with Amdocs has only intensified after Siebel acquired the billing and customer self-service provider eDocs, in late 2004. Given Siebel's recent intrusion into the BI market, we might even stand to be corrected by calling it a "semi-pure" customer relationship management (CRM) player. In any case, discussion indicates an intrinsic link between CRM and BI, which is possibly best illustrated within the market automation (MA) and customer service and call center markets (see Marketing and Intelligence, Together at Last and Analyze This).

Despite the challenge posed by Siebel and other rivals, SAS' move to build partnerships, especially with Amdocs should meet the growing need of communications service providers (CSP) seeking to build more profitable customer relationships. Until recently, crucial information was locked in Amdocs' disparate systems, such as billing, CRM, orders management, mediation, etc. and given this, CSPs were questioning such systems value. Through the collaboration between Amdocs and SAS, CSPs should now be able to collect this information and derive useful analyses to gauge the climate of the market and the temperament of their clients, and adjust and build services accordingly. Likewise, if successful, the vendors will also find profitability. SAS will be able to strengthen its position in the telecommunications market and extend its functional CRM footprint and Amdocs will be able to drive its MA strategy forward, and justify its new direction to its current customers. For more information see Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing series, Part Three.

When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing

When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing


To compete with leading BI and data warehouse companies and enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendors that are moving into these markets, SAS needs to further open its products to make it easier to employ third-party tools. Also, like Cognos, Hyperion, and Business Objects, SAS should also exploit the current, weaker BI technology position of many ERP vendors to foster relationships with them, rather than viewing them as the adversaries.

SAS may also have to further adjust its business model. Currently, it still primarily provides its software on an outdated mainframe licensing model, deriving over half of its revenues from annual license fees that amount to about one-third of the initial licensing cost of its products. This provides SAS with a steady income, but may not be an attractive option for many prospective customers. SAS should consider moving to a more common enterprise software licensing model with annual support costs in the range of 15 percent of license costs. With its new product, SAS 9, SAS may be showing signs of recognizing that the old model of selling a complex tool kit, and then training its customers' internal staff on the tools, needs to be extended to many levels within the user enterprise. Strong vertical tailoring, more consultancy, and more out-of-the-box functionality to all areas in a business process are other positive signs that should be further exploited by SAS.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

How One Vendor Supplies Agility to Post-implementation Enterprise Systems

How One Vendor Supplies Agility to Post-implementation Enterprise Systems

We are aware that grandstanding slogans like "unlimited data capture, key performance indicators, and alerting capabilities for reporting and analysis"; "combined business process, workflow, and reporting into a single, unified model"; or "financial and non-financial intelligence move in a lockstep, in a Lego block-style" mean little without concrete examples. To that end, the best illustration of Agresso's ability to incorporate architectural flexibility—without encumbering ledger accounts and master data—is the possibility of creating a ledger account structure with no sub-ledgers at all. This is contrary to the conventional approach to financial analysis, which is to create complex ledger structures with several sub-ledgers (for instance, with an account structure looking like x/xx/xx/xx/xxx/xxxx/xxx) so as to accommodate all possible reporting and analysis data fields, with combinations like "fund," "committee," "cost center," "department," "balance sheet," "division," "subjective account," and so on. For instance, CODA offers a multiple dimensional capability supporting up to eight variable-length account code segments, which enable revenue and expense tracking at a highly detailed level, while the hierarchies and account groups features add virtually unlimited account rollups to meet inquiry, reporting, and drilldown needs (see Composing Collaborative Financial Applications).

Agresso's approach to analysis is rather that almost any financial information can be rolled up via key building blocks, starting with the "attributes" mentioned in Part One of this series. These are the basic building blocks of the ABW application suite, and shape the way in which the system can be customized to meet a variety of information needs. In broad terms, attributes define which analysis is to be captured on entering transactions, but they can also be organized into reporting hierarchies to allow information to be viewed in different dimensions. The out-of-the-box attribute definition covers all of the master data (in other words, fixed or static) within the application (such as cost category, asset type, directorate, location, employee, cost center, department, event, expense type, project, fund, payee type, and property).

However, users can add their own definitions as required to deliver the analysis most appropriate to their business. Thus, using only the standard functionality, the application can be tailored, since the validity of attributes can be limited to certain defined date ranges, or to certain user groups, whereas linkages defined between attributes enable one attribute to be "owned" by another. As a further refinement, each unique attribute or category of analysis can have multiple values. Using this facility, it is possible to analyze adjustments separately for each accounting standard, if desired, to provide another layer of analysis, accountability, and control. Additionally, attributes can be reserved to specific user groups or limited to different user-defined date ranges, in which way it is feasible to keep year-end adjustments, for instance, separate from interim adjustments.

The capability to define relationships between attributes is another key differentiator for Agresso, and a major reason why it is not necessary to employ an external multidimensional reporting tool. Essentially, the definition of relationships in the system allows the systems administrator to create reporting hierarchies which are generally equivalent to the dimensions in a data warehouse. For instance, "employee" gets rolled up into (or reports to) "budget holder," which gets rolled up into "manager," which gets rolled up into "division," which gets rolled up into "directorate," etc. Remarkably, the same hierarchy can be used in reporting and enquiries to examine different data.

Furthermore, any new data gets captured based on rules—for instance, a certain account rule may determine other required attributes. Account rules within the suite govern the way individual accounts are treated in the application, as well as which information attributes must be entered when users post transactions to accounts. For instance, a direct cost account might require a cost center (which in turn requires a service area and division), a work order (which in turn requires officer, job, and job type), an element, etc. In the financial reporting context, careful use of the account rules in concert with attributes is absolutely central to the handling of complex multiple generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP), and to the ability to analyze the major geographies and business segments that contribute to the group turnover. The built-in control mentioned above also accelerates data entry, reduces input errors, and sets the basis of flexible reporting and reconciliations around all possible differing financial reporting requirements.

Furthermore, in the latest release of ABW, which incorporates workflow functionality at the attribute level, it is possible to create a controlled, auditable, and efficient response to a wide range of user needs, which also enables the system to be aware of how any new data might affect business processes and reports, which is quite awkward (if not impossible to achieve) in heterogeneous environments with multiplied metadata. In such cases, this metadata requires constant replication, and complex and costly software systems like master data management [MDM] applications—see SAP Bolsters NetWeaver's MDM Capabilities). This is particularly true for the large competitive offerings where broad application sets have been enlarged through acquisition rather than organic in-house development.

It should now be clearer how the Agresso's information warehouse, business process, and reporting and analytics information delivery models are inextricably linked in a virtual cycle. A change in any of these three core competencies automatically informs a change in the other two, and it is thus not necessary to re-architect the system or instil business disruption. For example, a new business process automatically leverages the information warehouse and reporting. Similarly, the addition of new metadata is immediately available to processes and analytics.

Finally, changes to analyses are immediately set in the business process context. In other words, power users orchestrating a new business process will automatically leverage the information warehouse and reporting capabilities. Similarly, the addition of new data from an acquisition is immediately transferred to established business processes and analytics. Also, new analysis requirements are immediately propagated directly into the organization's business process context.

Conversely, most Agresso competitors have to rely on third party solutions or less tightly bound in-house approaches, whereby superficially, information may flow between them, but in practice a change to one aspect inevitably requires a change to the other two, which quite often has to be accompanied by skilled IT intervention and thereby negatively impacted bottom-line margins.

To be fair, most ERP products now include a workflow tool (or even go to a higher level, meaning business process management [BPM] tools—see Business Process Management: A Crash Course on What It Entails and Why to Use It). To that end, Agresso has come up with the Agresso IntellAgent alerting and notification tool, which was released within ABW 5.4 SP4, to automatically monitor data and events in the suite for critical or time-sensitive conditions, and to then proactively report on business situations. Being an analytics and reporting methodology (rather than a mere workflow tool), IntellAgent generates alerts through a variety of media and devices, and takes other "intelligent" actions. In other words, it is a "sense and respond" business activity monitoring (BAM) tool that looks for certain events (such as the addition of a new row to a table, a change of field, the existence of a file within a sub-directory, etc.) and then responds with pre-determined action plans to this information. It enables the user to set up events that cover any aspect of the business (such as notification of outstanding payments or orders, or the generation of e-mails to the budget holder when actual expenses are nearing the budgeted amount). The tool is quite configurable, allowing alerts and events to be designed and set up for users with differing needs. This kind of automation of events and notifications in any user's business information system positions the enterprise to increase the effectiveness of its staff and organization, since time spent exploring ABW data for relevant information is thereby reduced significantly.

Finally, it's important to note that the combination of Agresso's information, process, and delivery model not only impacts the bottom line, but it should also impact the corporate strategies deployed by organizational management. By postponing or avoiding change that might be painful and stressful for organizational performance, companies often cripple otherwise valuable strategic initiatives. Agresso believes it is challenging corporate management to consider business strategies involving change—strategies that they might previously have discarded as "too onerous" to the business.

Moreover, what is really needed—and this is where Agresso goes a mile further—is a way to embed deep, meaningful business rules and logic down to the data (or field, or attribute level). For example, a well-devised solution will not allow anyone to reconfigure a workflow that would disregard US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) compliance steps (see Joining the Sarbanes-Oxley Bandwagon: Meeting the Needs of Small and Medium Businesses). Likewise, an "aware" enterprise system would not permit someone to move the drag-and-drop of a specific field to a different screen if that information is required for some other critical processing.

To be fair, some ERP systems have certain built-in controls, but these have been hard-coded without an easy way to discern pesky interdependencies, which quickly become impediments to change. As admitted by SAP's former chief executive officer (CEO) Hasso Plattner a few years ago, SAP R/3 had so much unneeded hard-coded functionality (so as to accommodate customer requirements over decades) that it eventually become too "obese"; only time will tell how the service-oriented architecture (SOA)-based SAP NetWeaver and SAP Enterprise Service Architecture (ESA) rewrite will help in that regard (whenever that colossal undertaking ends).

Further along the line of enabling post-implementation modifications (agility), the Agresso data model is accessible, allowing precise tailoring of parameters, additional fields, extensions to applications, and integration with external data sources, all without extensive IT staff input. This is also in sharp contrast to the competitive offerings, where even basic tailoring is almost always reliant on extensive consulting and programming input and configuration.

The release of ABW 5.5 heralded Agresso Flexi-fields, which is a dynamic feature that gives users the ability to straightforwardly define additional tabs, validated fields, and tables that meet their needs, when and where they desire. Users define the validation, access, and data control for these flexi-fields, and information added through flexi-fields can be in the form of external data, user-defined input fields (to expand master tables and attributes), or output from a Web browser-based template. Flexi-fields also help with customization and enhanced visibility, since customized screens speed up quality entry (with maximum validation), while grouping relevant data (internal and external), information, and transactions per entity for maximum visibility.

Furthermore, using workflow functionality, a user-definable approval process can be established at the attribute level. For example, if multiple financial reporting adjustments are implemented using attributes (as explained above, to accommodate the reconciliation of differing accounting principles at a group level, or for various units), a separate workflow or process sequence can be defined for all adjustments or particular categories of adjustment. The workflow is then created in a flowcharting tool, which describes the activities, decisions, and actions to be taken at each stage of the process. The workflow engine is integrated with Microsoft Outlook and Novell GroupWise, so that e-mails seeking approval for financial reporting adjustments can be passed automatically along the "pecking order," showing the nature of the approval required, and the individual seeking permission. Reviewers can, depending on the setup of the system, approve the request, reject the request, or change the data before passing it on to the next person, while at each stage, relevant e-mails can be automatically generated to notify users of the actions taken and the status of the workflow. Using the system in this way, it is possible to build an audit trail of the changes that have taken place and of the authorizations given. Also, by limiting the process to certain types of adjustment journals (via attribute values), time need only be spent reviewing those transactions considered to represent a risk to the organization.

In this regard, Agresso cites the success of a large user engineering corporation in the UK. This corporation has 3,600 employees, 5 divisions, 30 entities, over 60 offices worldwide, projects in 70 countries, and nearly $500 million (USD) in revenues. Formerly a flat organization with sixteen divisions (but without regions and market sectors), the corporation was reportedly able to structure itself in a manner of days from one into four financial reporting dimensions (market sectors, regions, entities, and cost centers) with accurate performance management, and one-on-one reconciliation with the past reporting structures. Again, where Agresso goes the extra mile is in the unusually tight coupling of its information model, business process model, and reporting and analytics delivery methodology, which enables its customers to make changes like this on the fly, at relatively little cost, and without the usual IT re-architecting that characterizes most competing products.

The Value Proposition and Strategy for an Agile Enterprise Systems Vendor

The Value Proposition and Strategy for an Agile Enterprise Systems Vendor

The final building blocks of the agility value proposition of Agresso, one of the world's top five providers of people-centric enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions, are "business views," which are the result of combining attributes, relations, and rules. Such information delivery is quite user self-sufficient, since different users can define their own hierarchy for viewing information in the database. This is again in sharp contrast to many competitors' greater reliance on third party tools for business intelligence (BI) and reporting. Agresso's architecture and all of the associated embedded BI is maintained in the integrated data model, and is available via a wide variety of reporting and analytics tools.

Part Three of the series Enterprise Systems and Post-implementation Agility—No Longer an Oxymoron?

Background information on Agresso and its product Agresso Business World (ABW) 5.5 can be found in Enterprise System and Post-implementation Agility—No Longer Necessarily an Oxymoron?. How Agresso achieves this agility is covered in How One Vendor Supplies Agility to Post-implementation Enterprise Systems. For information on the opportunity Agresso is addressing, see The Post-implementation Agility of Enterprise Systems: An Analysis and The Modelling Approach to Post-implementation Agility in Enterprise Systems.

One of the most popular ways of accessing data within the Agresso system is by using the "balance table," allowing user-defined views that can aggregate information by specific parameters, time periods, and company divisions across any modules within ABW (users can combine data from Agresso and non-Agresso sources). In broad terms, the process of defining a balance table requires the user to define which attributes are to be used to view the data, together with which amounts are to be reported. The balance table enquiry is linked to the reporting hierarchy, and is generated rapidly. The user can then drill down through the enquiry, taking different paths as appropriate, by defining filter options "on the fly."

Thus, Agresso provides extensive role-based views (or reports, or analyses), increasing the efficiency of information retrieval and the correlating business actions. Users can drill through the integrated information warehouse to underlying transactions, but also to documents and images appended by the Agresso document management system. The integrated Document Archive provides the ability to link transactions or master file information to documents (scanned images, Microsoft Excel workbooks, Microsoft Word documents), and to make hyperlinks to Web pages or any number of other file formats. Document sources can be external to Agresso (such as vendor invoices), or created within Agresso itself (as with the user's own customer invoices), and users can track changes to documents and maintain version control through the "check in/check out" function.

Ad hoc reporting is supported in a variety of ways, including inquiries on transactions, balances, and master file information within the information warehouse. Simple "point and click" technology defines report formats and saves templates as menu options for repeated and shared use, while embedded alerting and drilldowns can be free-format, or guided via links between successive templates. These templates can be exposed in other reporting tools to take advantage of additional functionality. The information delivery framework provides a common reporting platform that consists of the data source (database) layer, the data extraction (query engine) layer, and the data presentation layer, which can render the user interface (UI) in multiple ways.

One way of handling these presentational issues in ABW is to use its reporting engine, called Excelerator, which allows the output to be dynamically surfaced in Excel (or Word), while retaining the underlying financial intelligence. This means that the Excel workbook the tool creates is "live" on the ABW database, so that drilldowns, queries, and modifications are supported and updated on demand, with the latest updated values and figures in the database.

Alternatively, for even more control over presentation, there is Analyzer, which provides a wide variety of graphing options, or "information pages" that allow groupings of favorite reports or inquiries to be displayed as executable options on a start-up page. More traditional production reporting is supported through tools such as Agresso Report Writer, a text-based reporting tool that is well suited for audit reports, or Agresso Report Creator, a graphical reporting tool that provides a Crystal Report-like interface.

This liberal offering of reporting choices aims at catering to all possible user needs and tastes. Namely, whereas casual users will often be happy with web views or template viewers, controllers and accountant will require other, more sophisticated data presentation and manipulation means. The tight integration between information delivery and the underlying data model means that changes to metadata within the model are immediately exposed in the information layer. Operational reporting can be realigned almost immediately with new responsibilities following management reorganization; and by retaining old and new hierarchies, the system can readily support matrix style management reporting.

Owing to this virtually unlimited possibility of reconfiguring system capabilities without having to re-architect the system, Agresso's mission of late has been to change the entrenched (and often false) assumptions of chief executive officers (CXOs), starting with the idea that legacy ERP systems do not have to be replaced or re-architected every five to seven years (and much more frequently in constant change environments). Other assumptions or behaviors that will not be so easy to dispel include a lemming-like predilection for the same, restrictive "usual suspect," "biggest few" ERP choices that currently may deliver some pre-implementation flexibility, but that stop short at post-implementation agility.

Agresso strongly believes—and wants to instill the belief—that this ERP "poison pill" option is an unnecessary and even irresponsible choice, from both a fiduciary and business strategy perspective. Quite to the contrary, post-implementation business agility should be the primary goal of most CXOs in their ERP selection process, and should also be the fundamental goal for fast-paced people- and service-centric businesses.

Consequently, Agresso is launching quite aggressively into North America around the trademarked theme "ERP with NO Expiration Date." The company is targeting professional services and public sector organizations that are characterized by dynamic levels of business change and that can leverage Agresso's experience achieved within its large installation base in the commercial services sector (financial, accounting, insurance, etc.); architecture, engineering, and construction (A/E/C) firms; IT services organizations; and not-for-profit (NFP) and public sector organizations.

As elaborated earlier, these are change-driven people-centric business environments with frequent rescheduling, reorganizations, project go/kill decisions, etc. They have to compete in the industry consolidation landscape (laden with mergers, acquisitions, divestments, etc.), with frequent changes of organizational direction due to compliance or new accounting rules (in other words, due to obsolescence of old practices), while some initial public offering (IPO) pursuers are requiring the "best margin" practice. Agresso's solution (which is based on a coherent architecture that combines the transaction, information, and business process realms without compromise) certainly comes in handy here over traditional ERP platforms. This is particularly true since the latter were architected merely around processing large volumes of transactions, with analytics and business processes being afterthoughts.

To be fair, Agresso is not the only vendor with such a novel and brave approach. In a Technology Evaluation Centers (TEC) article from 2003, some vendors like Ramco Systems were praised for a similar approach with resulting reductions in the time, effort, and cost in building applications (see What's Wrong with Application Software? - A Possible Solution?; What Is It, Why And How Does It Fit Into Your Future). Customizations, which have traditionally been viewed as an undesired practice, thereby become much more sustainable. Also, the high cost of rebuilding applications as technologies change is greatly reduced, since the business process and rules of the application are stored independently from the software code, and can be regenerated onto new architectures. Business changes are also thereby analyzed based on changes to business processes and business rules, and the impact on the application can be assessed; changes can then be incorporated and visualized by the business analysts. Once the business is satisfied with the new application, new application code can be automatically generated.

Furthermore, applications using model-based architectures are built on business processes and rules, which allows business analysts to understand and make customizations to the application without compromising the quality of the application. This also obviates complex switches and parameterized tables for configuring the application with simple changes to rules. Custom applications can be built rapidly for very unique businesses or business functions, and such architectures allow for less complexity in the code and significant automation of software code development, which promises significantly increased application quality.

Notable modifiability and agility has also been reported by the fellow North European vendors Jeeves and IFS (see The Formula for Product Success: Focus on Flexibility and Cooperation and Enterprise Applications Vendor Reverses Fortunes - But Will Perseverance and Agility Be Enough?), and possibly by some Microsoft .NET-centric ERP vendors (see Subtle [or Not-so-subtle] Nuances of Microsoft .NET Enablement). However, without getting into a discussion about which vendor's idea is the best and most revolutionary (allowing modifications via, say, the metadata layer; intuitive macro programming language development environment; and so on), it suffices to say that none of these vendors directly competes within Agresso's target markets, and they might in fact just validate each other's approaches. A bigger threat or hurdle comes from the fact that all these agility messages from intuitive vendors might possibly be diluted by the service-oriented architecture (SOA)-based "magic bullet" messages from larger direct competitors.

As seen in Architecture Evolution: From Mainframes to Service-oriented Architecture, the SOA concept should, in theory, be able to help businesses respond more quickly and cost-effectively to changing market conditions by reconfiguring business processes. It should eventually enable agility, flexibility, visibility, collaboration with trading partners (and between functional and IT departments), and so on, by promoting reuse at the coarser (software component) service level rather than more granular (and convoluted) object levels. In addition, SOA—again, in theory—should simplify "plug and play" interconnection and usage of existing IT assets, including legacy assets.

According to Forrester, from the vantage point of business drivers, the concept should in the long run enable users to adapt their system to processes (and not vice versa), improve system intuitiveness and usability; deliver relevant analytics; connect to external data and services; and leverage readily available best practices and industry knowledge within the vendor repositories. In the technology lingo, SOA should reduce custom coding through configuration; promote open standards to reduce integration costs; enable end user self-sufficiency (meaning no reliance on nerdy programmers); and provide more flexibility to use best-of-breed products (possibly within composite applications). Except for the very last benefit, all these benefits coincide with Agresso's value proposition tenets, which might leave prospective customers at least confused and undecided.

Ironically, although seen as helping heterogeneous and legacy environments rejuvenate themselves, SOA might best function within homogenous domains and contexts, where data and processes are well aware of each other, as in Agresso's case. Lawson has recently embarked on a major SOA-based product rewrite called Landmark, to automatically generate product code (and services) and to avoid the possible SOA traps mentioned above, since the code generator will have all the validation rules and constraints within the scope of the Lawson S3 product (see A New Platform to Battle Software Bloat?).

These provisos aside, we still have a ways to go before the post-implementation change process becomes a solid, controlled process with built-in management and quality, while providing the business user with visualization and evaluation of potential modifications.

To recap, while SOA does facilitate standardization, allow for loosely coupled software components (services) assembly and integration, accommodate customized portal-based presentation, and thus perhaps facilitate integration, it is not a panacea yet. Hence, it is a fallacy to expect that the mere concept will turn rigid products written in ancient code into flexible applications providing analytic information that has not been natively enabled, and similar benefits. To radically change, the underlying product has to be either properly architected from the ground up (as with Agresso, which likes to compare its agility to a chameleon's ability to adapt to the environment), or totally rewritten in new, modern languages and technologies. For more information, see Rewrite or Wrap-around Old Software. Without true modernization of underlying applications, the SOA embellishments will largely be analogous to "putting makeup on a pig."

The Road Ahead for an Enterprise Management Software Vendor

The Road Ahead for an Enterprise Management Software Vendor

With new finances, Deltek certainly plans to continue its quest to build complete project solutions, from award to audit, via both internal development and acquisitions. As for future developments of Deltek Enterprise (Deltek Costpoint), in addition to ongoing Web enablement of key business processes, and delivery of control and reporting documentation related to the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), major new "order winning" capabilities will include EVM and PPM. For more on achieving SOX compliance, see Using Business Intelligence Infrastructure to Ensure Compliancy with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Joining the Sarbanes-Oxley Bandwagon; Meeting the Needs of Small and Medium Businesses. While EVM is meant to be added to both Deltek Costpoint and GCS Premier (but not to Deltek Vision, which already has the capability), PPM modules such as portfolio management, risk management, project scheduling, project analytics, and so on, are currently planned for Costpoint, although the intent, strategy, and actual product set allows for integration to any back-office solution.

More Opportunities and Challenges While the Deltek strategy to shore up its current install base and to target new related markets has been sound to date, one should never discount fierce competition as a factor, given that the market for enterprise application software has become highly competitive and dynamic. Deltek products are targeted toward a wide range of project-oriented organizations, and the competition varies depending on customer size, industry, and specific system requirements.

For larger implementations of enterprise-wide products, the principal competitors include Oracle (including former PeopleSoft and JD Edwards), Lawson Software, CODA, Unit 4 Agresso, and, inevitably, SAP. For smaller implementations of enterprise-wide products, competitors include Microsoft Business Solutions (especially when augmented by partner solutions for Microsoft Dynamics SL and Microsoft Dynamics GP [formerly Microsoft Great Plains]), Intuit, MYOB, Exact, Epicor, and Sage. Although many of the above vendors have not really competed regularly with Deltek so far, this will not necessarily be the case in the future, given Deltek's expansion aspirations.

There are also many other players which offer industry-specific products, such as (in the architectural, engineering, and construction [A/E/C] sector) Constructware, BST Consultants, and Axium, with some nifty features such as an electronic stopwatch for time collection, spread among several projects; and built-in warning systems when project is over budget (although Deltek Vision has this functionality, which will be released in version 4.1) or when the firm is going to overpay a subcontractor. Furthermore, Deltek Time Collection competes with electronic timekeeping systems offered by vendors such as Kronos, ADP, Ceridian, and Kaba Benzing. Its newly acquired Welcom applications face competition from such well-known companies as Microsoft Project, Primavera, Business Engines, Dekker, C/S Solutions, Artemis, Mantix, Integrated Management Concepts (IMC), and so on.

As the nonprofit sector requires automated allocation to support multiple funding sources under one project for billing and revenue recognition (which is traditionally done via manual calculations or custom programming within generic accounting solutions), Deltek has long supported multiple-source funding capabilities. The vendor has a nonprofit accounting product coming out later in 2006, which will target grant-based, or (as designated in the US) "A-133" nonprofit organizations. This product will be an affordable grant-based financial management system for small to medium nonprofit firms, which is a fairly sizable market in the US, contested by leaders like Blackbaud, Sage, Serenic Corporation, Intuit, Microsoft, Kintera, ASP eTapestry, and so on (see Nonprofits and Public Sector: The Latest Hot Market). While these leaders dominate the nonprofit market in a broader context—and no one is going after A-133s in any significant way at this time—this might change down the track. Point solutions like Deltek GovWin and CRM & Proposals might find their match in comparable solutions from providers like Adonix Inc., Map ROI Systems Inc., Input Inc., and others. Numerous project organizations have gotten used to manual "workarounds," and might still prefer the best-of-breed solutions they have in place—which might just be enough to represent a barrier for Deltek's all-encompassing offering.

Some of these competitors still have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than Deltek, not to mention a higher profile and recognition on a worldwide basis. Since they have begun to experience a deceleration in their core upper-market business, and have thus refocused their marketing and sales efforts towards the upper-middle market where Deltek actively markets its products, one should expect them to implement increasingly aggressive pricing programs. Furthermore, certain competitors, particularly Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, and Lawson, have well-established relationships with many Deltek customers (both current and prospective), and with major accounting and consulting firms which might have an incentive to recommend such competitors over Deltek. All these vendors, while possibly inferior regarding project-oriented, government-compliant, or service industries focus, will influence some purchase decisions by offering more comprehensive horizontal product portfolios and by touting a superior global presence and greater multinational product capabilities, which are still hurdles for Deltek. Still, comparisons to competitors need to be weighed with the understanding that no matter how large these competitors are, that they do not have the specific is industry focus and staff experience that Deltek does. Despite industry consolidation, Deltek remains a vendor that provides total solutions for project-oriented companies. There are really no competitors in the same space; either they are point solutions that compete in certain areas, or larger, non-project oriented vendors trying to tunnel down into this space.

But also, while Costpoint has long been very competitive with other major enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems with respect to features and capabilities for project-oriented businesses, the market has lately become more focused not only on the need for Web-based applications, but also on the need for intuitive role- and process-based user experiences (see Easy ERP: A Challenge to Conventional Thinking and Portals: Necessary But Not Self-sufficient). The lack of a fully Web-enabled system might for some time have hindered Deltek's potential growth objectives, and so the vendor has lately increased activity with respect to the Web-based development of Deltek Costpoint. Deltek believes that the realities of the market do not support the approach that the "best" solution is the one that is fully Web-based, based on the vast feedback from its customers. Deltek has chosen instead to build to the realities of the market and its customers, and the recent product developments reflect that pragmatic approach.

While the Web-enabled version is a great boost, the vendor needs to catch up with regard to developing portal-based solutions and user empowerment, especially in light of SAP's Mendocino and Microsoft's People-Ready recent initiatives (see Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements). Each role in a service organization has a unique e-project perspective. For instance, while project managers often need full control (including the ability to change project projections), rank-and-file staff typically only need to be able to record billable project hours, and accounting needs only enough access to build the company cash flows from aggregate project data. However, all these constituencies increasingly want to accomplish these tasks from their familiar Microsoft Excel and Outlook workspaces, without the need to switch between office productivity solutions and the underlying enterprise applications. Deltek is developing a portal-based strategy, which was one of the reasons for the Welcom acquisition. Furthermore, Deltek Vision supports this type of Outlook integration, and the vendor will be releasing Excel-based interactive billing in the 5.0 product release.

Enterprise Management Software Vendor Welcomes Additions

Enterprise Management Software Vendor Welcomes Additions

Deltek Systems, Inc. has become North America's principal provider of enterprise software and solutions for project-focused organizations. In mid-2005, Deltek announced that New Mountain Partners II, L.P. would make a majority capital investment in the company. See Mountainous Investment Transforms Enterprise Management Software Vendor for more information about this investment and its implications. This move, while certainly enhancing Deltek's prospects in terms of strengthening its global position, is not necessarily a change in fortunes.

What has changed, however, stems from 2005 being a landmark year marked by the expansion of a seasoned executive team, along with the advent of financial backing by New Mountain Capital (sponsor and manager of New Mountain Partners). In 2005, Deltek's management team welcomed new executive leaders, whose extensive expertise and strategic vision are expected to prime the company for continued growth. In addition to Parker, seasoned industry leaders Jim Reagan and Bill Clark joined in executive vice president (EVP) capacities, and also serve as chief financial officer (CFO) and chief marketing officer (CMO), respectively. Carolyn Parent also joined Deltek as new EVP of worldwide sales. Carolyn Parent also joined Deltek as new EVP of worldwide sales. From 2006 onwards, Deltek plans to further its momentum by continuing to enhance a winning product portfolio and by expanding into new project-oriented vertical and international markets.

Deltek recognizes that most organizations run their enterprises by using a sort of closed-loop, corrective action process, which consists of disjointed "predict," "measure," and "control" phases. While some product-based businesses may already have software solutions for creating a closed-loop process, most still need solutions to replace manual workarounds, and Deltek has embarked on a mission to garner a one-stop-shopping portfolio.

Accordingly, in March 2006, to enhance these development prospects, Deltek announced the acquisition of Welcom, a Houston, Texas (US)-based provider of such solutions, which allows Deltek to immediately provide important earned value management (EVM) capabilities to its broad government contracting customer base, and also to deliver comprehensive project portfolio management (PPM) solutions for many other project-focused organizations worldwide. The acquisition has also added more than 250 Fortune 1000 companies (including marquee names such as General Dynamics and BAE Systems) to Deltek's existing base of clients. Founded in 1983 (like its later parent, coincidentally), Welcom has been developing and selling project management tools to upper-end customers for whom complex project management is a critical business requirement. Its client list includes major manufacturers in the aerospace and defense (A&D), transportation, telecommunications, and architectural, engineering, and construction (A/E/C) industries, and its established presence in the European, Asian, and Australian markets should also create additional channels for Deltek to continue its much-needed expansion outside the US. In addition to cross-selling opportunities in the near future, the acquisition eliminates Deltek's need to interface with the likes of Microsoft Project, Meridian, or Primavera, and allows it to keep a bigger share of the customer wallet to itself.

Welcom products, including the Cobra EVM and Open Plan PPM products, will continue to be developed, licensed, maintained, and supported by Deltek. While they will continue to be sold as standalone products (owing to interfaces with some enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like SAP or former Baan [now SSA Global LN]), these products will integrate important portfolio analysis, risk management, cost and earned value management, and project collaboration functionality with Deltek's enterprise management solutions. The Open Plan product is a feature-rich, multiproject resource and cost modeling and reporting tool, which includes many tools for mid-level and top-level managers for displaying project status and cost with a traffic light metaphor (green, yellow, red). A project manager can use the professional version of the tool to schedule multiple projects simultaneously, whereas later versions will include an e-mail adviser which will enable mail messages to be sent based on alert conditions.

In general, PPM entails a strategy for management of a portfolio of related or interdependent projects, with the intent of limiting redundant work efforts, and optimizing decision-making and resource skills across projects. The idea is to take a holistic view of projects and their relationships, and to focus on the potential for project benefits to be controlled across the enterprise. Such applications are used for automating and optimizing the initiating, planning, scheduling, allocation, monitoring, and measuring of the activities and resources required to complete projects. Portfolio management capabilities enable the tracking of an aggregate of projects, products, programs, and initiatives, in order to oversee resource profiling and allocation, which in turn are useful tools for making ongoing investment and prioritization decisions, and for tracking risks as part of an overall portfolio.

PPM tools are high-end, multiproject management tools which help organizations to manage the scope, time, and cost of discrete sets of related people-based processes (projects) on an individual and portfolio basis, with integrated time reporting, executive information reporting, and project accounting interfaces. In the greater scheme of things, PPM can include the breadth of horizontal and vertical solutions, such as construction management, facilities management, professional service automation (PSA), aspects of information technology (IT) governance solutions, and so on—all developed around the idea of successful project completion and delivery as the business raison. For more information, see Project Portfolio Management for Service Organizations: Bridging the Gap between Project Management and Operations.

While EVM has long been a US Department of Defense (DoD) requirement for defense manufacturers, it is becoming increasingly more common with commercial, non-defense, project-based manufacturing sectors. In fact, there are indications that many US federal organizations besides DoD (such as the Department of Transportation [DoT] and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA]) have been lowering the project value threshold which mandates the use of EVM reporting (from $50 million [USD] to $5 million [USD]). In 2005, the US Office of Management and Budget stated its intention to enforce EVM in IT projects at federal agencies, including compliance with American National Standards Institute/Electronics Industries Alliance (ANSI/EIA) standard 748. While defense agencies have been applying this standard for some time, the US Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the US Defense Acquisition Regulations Council have proposed a revision to federal accounting regulations (FAR) to standardize use of EVM across the government.

These moves stem from the buyers' needs for assurances that they are using a contractor who can deliver; on the contractor side, these enterprises certainly will not stay in business if they can't deliver as required. Thus, EVM compliance may give both parties a measure of confidence that project goals can be met. However, the use of EVM is a major shift from the traditional project accounting practice of merely (and occasionally) ensuring that actual costs are in line with the estimated cost, and few companies outside the defense arena have sufficient knowledge and maturity to use it. By introducing the dimension of time (in addition to cost and performance elements, all integrated within the project scope of work), EVM attempts to prevent project cost increases, which are often due to scheduling problems, by highlighting the need to identify problems before they are past the point of no return, whence considerable delay and cost result.

Consequently, all project participants need to learn of variances immediately. They do not have the luxury of waiting until, say, the end of the month, to discover that a project is in jeopardy. To that end, an EVM solution must show variance to the estimate at completion (EAC) (although there is an overwhelming number of similar indicators) of a project as soon as a significant change occurs. In other words, EVM concretizes project progress so that one can look at project evolution and compare how much has been spent to how much should have been spent. Thus, EVM is good at exposing the fact that a contracting company does not have a good project plan, or that it has a good plan but may be unable to follow it. Again, although the private sector might benefit from harnessing EVM systems (both for improving competitive advantage and for internal risk management), implementation requires significant education and familiarity with the concepts, along with dozens of formulas, and key performance indicators (KPIs) and their meanings. Additionally, implementation requires everyone to start reporting their time and achievements, every day, by hour, against a set of activities—all of which is a major change management issue. For more information on the qualities and operating characteristics of EVM (some of which are described in ANSI 748), see Federal Contract Management and Vendors' Readiness.

In October 2005 the company also acquired competing financial management software firm Wind2, thereby increasing its customer base to 11,000 firms, and furthering its dominance in a number of key vertical markets. Both firms shared a focus on A/E/C companies (as well as government contractors, IT services firms, and management consultants), and have thus often directly competed in these markets in the past. The acquisition has allowed Deltek to strengthen its leadership role in the professional services market, while adding approximately $10 million (USD) in revenues. In fact, of Deltek's record 25 percent revenue growth in 2005, 2 percent was attributed to the Wind2 acquisition alone. In addition, this acquisition added more than 3,000 customers to Deltek's former base of 8,000 clients, including such marquee names as Custom Research, Inc., Apex Environmental, Inc, and MCW Consultants, Ltd. Deltek has also welcomed Wind2's over eighty employees from five locations, including a training facility in Fort Collins, Colorado (US), and four branch offices throughout the US and Canada.

Today, Deltek clients represent more than 81 percent of the 500 largest revenue-generating A/E/C firms in the US, as ranked by Engineering News Record (ENR) in 2005. Furthermore, nearly 65 percent of the largest federal government contractors are Deltek clients, as ranked by Washington Technology. Of Deltek's total install base, the A/E/C clients represent about 60 percent; government contracting represents about 20 percent; professional services or management consulting represent about 8 percent; and nonprofit organizations, IT services (or systems integration [SI]), and project manufacturing organizations contribute a few percentage points each.

Deltek has a history of successful and astute acquisitions in the space, starting with the 1998 acquisition of Harper & Shuman, Inc., formerly a renowned provider of accounting software to A/E/C firms. This acquisition, which included the Advantage and CFMS product lines, in addition to adding 2,800 firms to Deltek's install base, was a major step in supporting Deltek's strategy of providing comprehensive business solutions to firms in the A/E/C industries.

In early 2000, Deltek unveiled its vision and launched its initiative to become the vendor of choice in the then emerging market for PSA software. To that end, Deltek acquired A/E Management Services, Inc., including the RFP GenTrak product line, which was a marketing, proposal, and opportunity tracking automation system for A/E/C companies. In late 2000, Deltek acquired Semaphore, Inc., a major developer and distributor of advanced financial and project management software and services for over 2,000 A/E/C companies and other professional services firms. That acquisition doubled Deltek's market share of the A/E/C industry, and gave it a 72 percent share of the firms listed in ENR's top 500 design firms.

As with the aforementioned acquisitions, Deltek pledges to continue to support and maintain all Welcom and Wind2 products, including Cobra, Open Plan, WelcomHome, WelcomPortfolio, WelcomRisk, Wind2 Award, and Wind2 FMS (the financial management system renamed as Deltek FMS), a modular, Microsoft Office-compatible product which complements Deltek's broad product line of project-based solutions for professional services firms of all sizes. These solutions include Deltek Vision, Deltek GCS Premier, and Deltek Costpoint.

Providing a good example of how Deltek manages acquired products is its acquisition of Harper & Shuman in the late 1990s, which was in line with its aim to penetrate the A/E/C market. At the time, Harper & Shuman was the market leader with its premier product Advantage, which had been introduced in 1997 as one of the first Y2K-compliant products in the market segment. Several years later, Deltek is still selling, maintaining, enhancing, and supporting the Advantage product line, and a similar strategy is envisioned for the Deltek FMS product, whose clients should now have more choices because they can look at other Deltek products, including Vision, which is both technologically advanced (it is Web services-based) and functionally advanced. While FMS concentrates mainly on project accounting and some product management capabilities, Vision adds resource planning, project management, client relationship management, proposal automation, document management, and so on.

However, Deltek also pledges not to force any clients to move in the direction of adopting new products if they are comfortable where they are, and they pledge to grant support for the FMS product. At the same time, the vendor has been adding the FMS features that are currently missing in Vision (such as a strong collections module), and it has already begun to train a subset of the development group acquired with Wind2 on the Vision architecture. Additionally, it has been looking at designing a data conversion utility that will convert FMS data into Vision for those clients who are interested in making that move, given that Deltek FMS is a Microsoft Windows-based product with a client/server architecture, and not Web-based.

It might be useful to clarify the fact that Deltek currently offers a plethora of products, which range from legacy systems to modern applications, from offerings for the lower-end of the market to systems for large enterprises, and from best-of-breed point solutions to more complete product suites. Looking horizontally across the range, its project-focused portfolio of solutions offers a number of modules:

* ERP modules (such as project-based accounting, financials, materials management, human resources [HR], and payroll management), used by 10,000 customers

* customer relationship management (CRM) modules (such as business development tools, sales force automation [SFA], client relationship management, and proposal automation), used by 1,800 customers

* human capital management (HCM) modules (such as time collection and expense management, resource and project planning, employee self-service), used by 1,200 customers

* business performance management (BPM) mmodules (for example, balanced scorecards, forecasting, and planning tools), used by 1,900 clients

* PPM tools (per the Welcom acquisition)

The BPM and HCM tools have recently received notable enhancements, including pre-packaged performance-based data marts; a new reporting tool for Deltek Costpoint that leverages Cognos ReportNet; and pre-built reports, analytics, and scorecards for project-based businesses on the BPM side. The BPM suite is the further evolution of the former Deltek Enterprise Planner product suite, the result of Deltek's partnership with Adaytum Software (now part of Cognos), which was announced in late 1999.

A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends

A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends


TEC's continuing question and answer (Q&A) series, in which we solicit vendors' responses to our questions and observations on market trends (see previous articles in this series: Two Stalwart Vendors Discuss Market Trends and A Partner-friendly Platform Provider Discusses Market Trends), has become quite popular with readers and vendors alike.

Another market player that has voiced its opinions is Norfolk, Virginia, (US)-based xTuple (formerly OpenMFG). Privately held xTuple is a self-financed developer of enterprise-class business process applications powered by open source software and infrastructure such as Linux operating system (OS), PostgreSQL database, and Qt, a C++ graphical user interface (GUI) development framework from Trolltech, a Norwegian software company.

Before delving into xTuple's answers to our questions, some background on xTuple and OpenMFG is in order. The vendor is a relative newcomer in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) arena; it was founded in 2002 (as OpenMFG) by its current president and chief executive officer (CEO) Ned Lilly, a former executive at Landmark Communications.

The first we learned of OpenMFG was at an industry event in early 2003, where the company had a booth and was able to brag about only a few pilot ("beta," or test) customers. Our impression at that time, given the depressed economy worldwide and the demise of so many vendors, was that a brand new ERP provider was not badly needed in the market. However, xTuple has, to a degree, proved us wrong: its current roster of xTuple ERP commercial customers to date is about 100, and it has 20 partner resellers. The company's focus on the smaller enterprises, with up to $100 million (USD) in revenues, must have played a great part in its current success. The free version of xTuple ERP has also been downloaded over 150,000 times from SourceForge.net, the world's largest development and download repository of open source code and applications.

Expanding Product Offerings

Though it might not sound like marketing wizardry to some, the xTuple name was picked to denote the company's diversification in terms of product offering: OpenMFG, a manufacturing-oriented ERP product; OpenRPT, an open source report writer; and the most recent PostBooks open source accounting/ERP application. The name xTuple, therefore, speaks to the exponential growth possible with open source solutions.

The vendor continues to develop and market the xTuple ERP OpenMFG Edition, its commercially licensed solution for small to midsized manufacturers. The maturing manufacturing-focused ERP product will continue to be available under the hybrid community source code license that the company has employed for the past six years. In this arrangement, partners and customers get full source code, and any subsequent enhancements flow into the base product to which xTuple maintains and claims the intellectual property rights.

Having been referred to on occasion as a quasi–open source provider, xTuple points out it has never claimed that the OpenMFG Edition is fully open source (the vendor knows enough about that "clique-y" and somewhat snobbish world to be very careful with its choice of words and definitions). Yet the company believes that the hybrid approach has offered the best of both worlds to its users for the past five years in terms of a solid, professionally supported ERP solution built on a fully open source infrastructure, and licensed under a community source license through which community members can be actively involved in the product's ongoing development.

What's new is the PostBooks product: the company has carved off a new, entry-level, fully open source product that shares the same code base as the commercially licensed Editions. In fact, the client binaries are identical for both products, so an upgrade from PostBooks to the Standard or OpenMFG Editions involves running a simple database script. The only difference is that OpenMFG offers more advanced functionality in manufacturing and distribution, which non-manufacturing enterprises probably do not need. For more details about the commercially licensed xTuple ERP Standard Edition product (targeted at distributors and retail), and the free PostBooks Edition and the OpenMFG Edition, see http://www.xtuple.com/comparison for a chart of all three products.

To be more precise, OpenMFG-specific features cover approximately 20 percent of the highest-value functionality, such as multi-warehouse inventory, warehouse transfer orders, lot/serial control, manufacturing resource planning (MRP), master production schedule (MPS), bills of operations (BOOs)/routings, breeder bills of material (BOMs), item transformations, infinite capacity planning, lean/buffer management, returns/service, and batch manager/electronic data interchange (EDI).

PostBooks is available now as free and open source software (FOSS) on SourceForge.net, and elsewhere under common public attribution license (CPAL) open source license. Based on over 150,000 downloads to date, and the active community of users and developers at SourceForge.net and xTuple's own xtuple.org website, xTuple thinks the offering will be a big hit. Thus, the two communities will grow in tandem, while xTuple pledges to manage the ongoing development of both products, so that enhancements to one can flow into the other. As mentioned above, it is the same code base, after all; should a PostBooks user enterprise ever wish to upgrade to OpenMFG, it only has to run a short upgrade script on its database. Since the business logic for both applications resides in the PostgreSQL back end (in the procedural language), this is relatively easy to maintain.

PostBooks, xTuple believes, is one of the most advanced open source accounting/ERP solutions out there in the market. The recent 3.0 version of xTuple ERP featured what xTuple billed as "the world's only open source ERP product configurator" as part of the base PostBooks package. Of course, the OpenMFG and Standard Editions will also continue to feature added advanced functionality that will make it "worth the upgrade" from the free "sibling" (related) product, especially for small manufacturers that cannot afford the money and time requirements of traditional ERP deployments. As a company, xTuple pledges to support the entire technology stack its applications employ, notably the PostgreSQL database.

Appealing Pricing Transparency

Where xTuple is indisputably "open" (referring back to the question of OpenMFG's true open source nature) is in the vendor's transparency about its pricing and current product functionalities. For one, product pricing is available online. Despite new product additions, OpenMFG pricing remains unchanged, and the application continues to be offered as either 1) a subscription-style license (which includes software maintenance) at $1,000 (USD) per user, per year; or 2) a perpetual license at $3,000 (USD), plus 18 percent annual maintenance (for a minimum of five users). The pickup among the current customer base is roughly 50-50.

While PostBooks is free software, xTuple offers some commercial support options, such as an annual retainer at roughly half the cost of OpenMFG annual license and incident-based bundles of consulting hours. Following are some of the vendor's selected productized professional service offerings:

*the QuickStart implementation package (10 days and a project plan)

*three grades of networked server maintenance: basic, backup, and premium

*PostgreSQL database support, tuning, replication—a number of tiered offerings with details available on the company site

Last but not least, there are some xTuple ERP server appliances, such as three configuration options based on the user count and level of support.
As for the product's available out-of-the-box functionality, it is also a "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" approach. There are a dozen or so xTuple ERP modules with functionalities that flow in a cohesive and logical manner. Prospective users can "test drive" xTuple ERP functionality at http://www.xtuple.com/demo/video.

The company's employees are seasoned ERP executives, sales, or presales personnel from former or current competitors of xTuple. This has played a major role in designing xTuple's capabilities from scratch, as it was essential to provide only the necessary, nifty product capabilities first. It was also necessary to stay away from the "functional bloat" (extraneous functionality; see A New Platform to Battle Software Bloat?) which all too often becomes overkill for smaller enterprises.

To that end, currently available xTuple ERP functionality revolves around the following modules, capabilities, or processes:

*Inventory management—enabling multi-warehouse and multilocation functionality, cycle counting, lot and serial tracking, and traceability, etc.

*Product definition—enabling BOMs, routings, standard costing, actual costing, etc.

*Manufacturing—enabling MRP, MPS, capacity requirements planning (CRP), shop floor control (SFC), labor entry, material variances, etc.

*Purchasing and accounts payable (A/P)—enabling segmented requisitions and purchase orders, accounting controls, vendor performance reports, etc.

*Sales, customer relationship management (CRM) and accounts receivable (A/R)—enabling 360-degree customer views, sales quotes, multidimensional pricing schedules, sales contacts, incidents, to-do lists, opportunities, etc.

*Shipping and receiving—integrated with UPS, FedEx, and other leading shippers, and fully bar code–enabled

*General ledger (G/L)—enabling detailed G/L and journals, bank reconciliation, budgeting, customizable report engine, etc.

*Many system-wide utilities—fine-grained user privileges and security, batch manager, events engine, hotkeys, calendars, EDI, international locales and complex tax structures, multicurrency, project management, etc.

Community-led Product Development

Certainly, one wonders how a company of only about 15 employees could have developed so much functionality from the ground up. Well, if one counts the help from the entire development community (including customers and resellers), the answer to this becomes clear. For instance, the current xTuple director of product development, John Rogelstad, is an experienced ERP expert and consultant who implemented OpenMFG as a customer during his prior employment at Marena Group, and who has written major new areas of functionality.

One of these new functionalities is the recently released constraint management capability. This new functionality follows along the lines of the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and simplified Drum-Buffer-Rope (S-DBR) concepts (see The Theory of Constraints Enters the Lean Manufacturing Arena). The developed code was footnoted with references to the "fathers of TOC," Goldratt and Schragenheim. The solution looks deceptively simple, but many people actually take a while to "get" it (learn and understand) because it appears to be counterintuitive at first. Basically, the target customer for this solution is someone who has pulled out half his or her hair trying to program the shop with a complex finite scheduler, only to find that the system recommendations conflict with reality.
In addition to constraint management, new major enhancements in version 2.x were made to CRM, MPS and forecasting, and multicurrency. The CRM module introduced the concept of "accounts;" the idea is that users can have various types of relationships with companies. Conversely, in many other systems, users are prohibited from having a vendor that is also customer. Thus, in OpenMFG, the "C" in CRM really ought to stand for "corporate." An account can be a prospect (one that might become a customer), vendor, partner, competitor, or even a tax authority. Thus, users can have as many individual contacts and addresses assigned to the account as they like. So, the module is really a fully integrated contact manager and CRM system that is also a starting point for deeper ERP functionality in sales, purchasing, etc.

Version 3.x, new this year, adds a user-friendly screen builder and JavaScript support for designing customized system dashboards; major enhancements to returns processing; advanced warranty tracking; integration with external shopping carts such as Yahoo Stores; and the aforementioned assemble-to-order (ATO) product configurator for streamlining non-inventory order processing.

Diverse xTuple Customers …

As stated above, xTuple's install base is nearing 100. Target customer situations include both new, "green field" ERP implementations (with no ERP system ever having been on-site) for smaller companies, and replacement systems for unhappy customers stuck with a casualty of the ERP Graveyard. Based on the functionalities discussed above, the OpenMFG Edition seems a good fit for discrete manufacturers in the make-to-order (MTO), make-to-stock (MTS), and especially mixed-mode environments. There is also a fair amount of support for batch process manufacturing.

In fact, a wide variety of industries is represented in the customer base: industrial machinery (oil pipelines and valves, water purification, hydraulic and pneumatic tools, etc.); transportation manufacturers (engines, bicycle components, aerospace, automotive parts, etc.); semiconductor and electronics (imaging sensors, magnetic encoders, storage, backup hardware, etc.); and consumer goods or retail manufacturers (dental, beauty epoxies, post-surgical garments, etc.).

One particular functionality that makes xTuple applicable to various, seemingly unrelated industries is breeder BOM (also known as inverted BOM, or reverse BOM elsewhere in the industry), which manages coproducts and byproducts. While this need is obvious in food industries (see Fatal Flaws and Technology Choices), it is also applicable for some electronics manufacturers and metal centers. For instance, printed circuit board (PCB) makers can have one breeder item (a circuit board) that produces multiple coproducts (individual chips). The same process would be true for cut-to-size industries (see Cut-to-size/shape Industries).